New York Times Co. (NYT)
Loading...
Symbols:
NYT Forum Topics
- All Comments on NYT
- General Discussion on NYT
- Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
- Newspaper Ad Revenues Gaining Downhill Momentum; Online Struggling Too [view article]
- At New York Times, the Futurist Is Now... Leaving [view article]
- WSJ Engages The NY Times on the Luxury Battlefield [view article]
- The New York Times: Living in Denial [view article]
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
- Newspaper Stocks: New York Times Company, Gannett and McClatchy [view article]
- Board and Executive Compensation in S&P 500 [view article]
- The New York Times Struggles Online in July [view article]
- Too Late for Newspapers to Turn the Tide? [view article]
- The Top Dividend Paying ETFs and Stocks [view article]
loading ...Recent NYT Articles
- Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times
- Newspaper Ad Revenues Gaining Downhill Momentum; Online Struggling Too
- At New York Times, the Futurist Is Now... Leaving
- No Angst or Shame in 'WSJ' Magazine Debut
- WSJ Engages The NY Times on the Luxury Battlefield
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- The New York Times: Living in Denial
- The New York Times Struggles Online in July
- Newspaper Stocks: New York Times Company, Gannett and McClatchy
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News
- Full List of Articles »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
if it folds i think the world would survive.i havent bothered since it backed castro in the eisenhower years.i survived. ReplyDesperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
The New York Times stupidly ended its online subscriptions. I liked subscribing to the Times online, with the extra benefits the package carried. I wouldn't mind paying something like up to $100 annually for a subscription with a few perks tossed in. ReplyBlackman
Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
Don't know why the folks at the New York Times bother. Its best use is in lining the bottoms of bird's cages and the birds haven't even noticed... ReplyMason
Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
It appears these changes only affect the New York edition, not the national edition. Basically they are making the New York edition more like the national edition. I guess I see how that could save costs. ReplyDesperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
you should be in LA. They've done far worse to the LA Times. They (zell) just wanted the real estate anyway, which they've promptly put up for sale. ReplyWhitey
Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
It is 'Punch'.Punch will burn in Hell with all the rest of the MSM crew. I subscribed to the NYT for decades. It has degenerated into a disgusting mess, fraught with made-up stories, outright lies and prominent slant. It deserves a miserable and ignominious end, which is in process. Rather than keep pace with its readership, it has devolved into something despicable. In its last days, that formerly great institution will be justly mocked. Reply
Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
Yes ladies and gentlemen, a genius businessman is at work again.I have no doubt that these moves are going to slash costs and make this a ten times better product. The sky is the limit for this incredible company. I thought they could never surpass the brilliance of reducing the actual size of the pages, but bam, they just keep coming up with better ideas.
Their best move though was without a doubt the one they decided against. The one thing they could have done that would have ruined the company. Yes friends, that is changing the actual paper from socialist propaganda to a real news gathering outfit. Lets be serious, imagine the disaster that would have occurred if they actually started reporting the news instead of providing 100 pages of left wing editorials each day.
These progressives are so out of touch with this country. Just elite snobs who think the reason people don't read their rag is because we are all idiots who cling to our guns and religion. They have absolutely no respect for Americans and their investors are paying for it. Reply
Pseudonym
Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
Very exciting changes!I'm subscribing right after this post! Reply
Newspaper Ad Revenues Gaining Downhill Momentum; Online Struggling Too [view article]
getting rid of the neighborhood delivery teen did not help. ReplyCt
Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
The New York Times is nothing but a Left Wing,America hating rag......... ReplyNewspaper Ad Revenues Gaining Downhill Momentum; Online Struggling Too [view article]
As a 20 plus year veteran of the Newspaper industry...as an Advertising Management professional (Daily and Weekly, Shoppers, Family Owned, and Corporate Owned) I have an insiders opinion.Newspaper revenues have been self inflicted wounds. Family owned newspapers in smaller markets are in much better shape than newspapers in markets owned by corporations or large groups. Many of the problems can be repaired, or at least the declines arrested.
The main issues can be laid at the feet of top executives and publishers. Therefore, the problems can be corrected by examining them, and probably removing most of them.
The problem....lack of long term vision, and the wrong skill set to correct them. Corporate newspapers have valued only the immediate months' Operating Profit, and designed compensation programs accordingly. Corporate directors receive bonus payments based on either annual or divisional factors. This system has focused on the very short term performance financially.
Virtually no focus is placed on the fundamentals of the business. Adding to this, high level managers at the local and corporate level have changed in professional fields of expertise. Over the past 10 years, most local publishers and higher corporate types are now financial managers- accountants- not Editors, Advertising, or Circulation types. Think of that for a moment, and you can begin to see a large part of the long term problem.
Newspapers have traditionally attracted people interested in reading news that is important to them. Advertising was strong, because local advertisers could rely on both strong readership of their ads, and affordable ad rates that reflected return on investment. Both have been seriously eroded, and may be too late to correct.
Readership has been eroded, because senior management directed focus on short term bonus' for themselves. Examples...the refusal to invest resources and time for local Circulation managers to build home delivery services of newspapers. Instead, a practice of artificially "puffing" circulation is the focus. Almost all newspapers now have NIE departments (Newspaper In Education). Sounds good on the surface, however, the main reason the departments exist, and the main responsibility, is getting large bulk sales to schools paid for by businesses. That is then called "paid circulation" and reported as such to the ABC (Audit Bureau of Circulation). Another practice is to "wrap" a newspaper with a "jacket" of newsprint with ads on it. That "jacket" is paid for by advertisers, then dropped at hotels etc, perhaps at major league sporting events or concerts. Then, that entire pressrun is counted as "paid" as well. Using a newspaper to help reading programs is not really the circulation Advertisers are counting on. Nor is a free newspaper at the hotel desk. Home delivery is the most important, with paid single copy sales next.
The problem? Real newspaper circulation is far less than stated. The consequence is that ads don't reach real readers, and ads don't work as well as in the past. This "puffed" circulation is the basis that ad rates are sold to advertisers.
Why does this matter? Many publishers receive bonus based on circulation increases, not the type of circulation. Ad rates have also faced similar issues. Circulation goes down, ad rates go up, and results for those advertisers go down as well. In the online area, Publishers refuse to re think the model. Classified ad rates were raised artificially and forced online, with no infra structure to give that online ad a chance to work. It was done simply to add revenue. Results for the customer were not considered. That inflated price gave rise to Craigslist, Monster, and many others that have eroded Classified ads.
Display advertising is no different. Less real circulation, yet higher rate. What other industry does that? Give you less, but charge you more. Very poor execution of the online revenue model. Many publishers try to count online pageviews as extra circuation. Marginally true, but the print advertiser gets NO benefit of it, and the online only advertiser gets no benefit from the print. So, not completely accurate to "spin" online pageviews as circulation to advertisers
In the newsroom, the head counts have been drastically slashed. The only reason anyone even buys a newspaper is to read the news. The problem is not so much the cuts, as WHO has been cut, or quit. The more tenured and experienced the newsperson, the more likely they are to be be gone from today's newsroom.
At some point, there will be an executive in one of the companies that will state the obvious, and make some bold decisions. If the CEO does not fire them immediately, the changes needed will be done, and the newspaper industry will recover in some form. Until then, the death spiral will continue. The market will crush many of them, and only a few will survive. Local family owned newspapers have a better chance of survival, because they tend to make better long term decisions.
Think of it this way...an NFL team cuts it's best quarterback, running backs, line, and defense, but KEEPS the rookies and third stringers! Then expects the team to win the Superbowl, and expects you to pay the full ticket price to watch em! Then, the executive is surprised by an empty stadium!!
Reply
Newspaper Ad Revenues Gaining Downhill Momentum; Online Struggling Too [view article]
it can be true even if we dont like it. newspapers can go the way of the buggywhip.most kids that i know are not interested in the news,nevermind the newspaper.in my day,last century,most kids at least read the paper for the cartoons.there is no future for print with most of todays kids & they are the future.the world will survive. ReplyDesperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
Let's start an over-and-under pool on how many years until this American icon goes broke and ceases publication. I would pick 14 years but at my age I myself may not last long enough to collect my winnings. Pinch (what a nickname) has destroyed an American institution in pursuit of his social outlook. ReplyNewspaper Ad Revenues Gaining Downhill Momentum; Online Struggling Too [view article]
this and also telephone book ad decline is just as steep and t.v. news ads are way down. tech is changing everything and it's not an advertising recession when it comes to some of this. newspapers will not recover substantially nor will the phone books or t.v. news.the only spot left is the web and the recession IS the impact there. Reply
Desperate Times Bring Redesign to NY Times [view article]
Brilliant - Pinch takes the skewed slant from page 4 and moves it to page 7 while leaving the skewed slant on page one right where it has been. This is likely to fix all ills as the reader will be blown away by the new look and never figure out that he is still reading the same old crap that serves the publisher's partisanship. Wish I'd thought of that. Reply